Session leaders: Marie Louise Stig Sørensen, Cambridge University & Joanna Sofaer, Southampton University
This session sets out to locate patterns and modes of social responses to transcultural flows within the various levels of societal complexity. Were local cultural traditions reinforced or did they, in fact oppositely, change? If altered, to what degree did this take place and at what scale?
Papers may pursue the ways in which different forms of transculture underwent creative translations and the consequences this had for the construction of identities. Did these new material platforms inspire new forms of identification?
The session has two subthemes, which offer some possible entries for papers:
Session leaders: Johannes Müller, Kiel University & Kostas Kotsakis, Thessaloniki University
This session sets out to explore the economic and political basis of increased mobility that characterises the Bronze Age in Europe overall. Did increased cultural mobility either oblige or inspire people to widen their economic and political practices? How did trends towards integration impact daily life and the social environment of local communities? Did increased intercultural mobility emanate from periods of crisis or wealth? Did it impact day- to-day activities positively or negatively?
The session has two subthemes, which outline some possible entries for papers:
Session leaders: Helle Vandkilde, Aarhus University & Svend Hansen, DAI-Berlin
This session sets out to track how innovative styles of culture – connected to short or longer distance movements and to increased mobility – became widespread with particular emphasis on accounting for the means and directions of the transmission of culture.
However, any movement reflects a unique temporality (duration, break, pace, rhythm), which reverberates with its surroundings in particular ways, e.g. when new settlements arise along migrational trajectories. Movement is therefore not to be considered only in terms of the physical points between which it occurs but, rather, as a unique temporal phenomenon through which new human worlds emerge.
The session has two subthemes, which offer some possible entries for papers:
Session leaders: Kristian Kristiansen, Gothenburg University & Helle Vandkilde, Aarhus University
This session sets out to track and explain changing geo-political constellations and boundaries through time. It highlights ‘marginal’ communities, hotspots and gateway societies in Europe in relation to mobility patterns and systems. The 2,500 years of the Bronze Age represent the first era in which convergence – at certain times and in an apparently regular manner – frequently prevailed over divergence. In a manner of speaking, the European Bronze Age shared cultural expressions while simultaneously developing local and regional differences.
This session seeks to pinpoint cultural and societal conjunctures and ‘cultures of contact’ in non-state Europe in order to determine whether they occurred independently of early state-organised societies in the south.
Papers are thus invited which scrutinise those diversities and commonalities on a regional and European level that emerged from increased intercultural trafficking. This may include discussions of the possible relationship between micro-scale events, everyday-practices and structures of mobility on the one hand and, macro-scale conjunctures and disjunctures on the other.
Possible entries for papers may be found in the following subthemes:
Session leaders: Mads Kähler Holst, Aarhus University & Johan Ling, Gothenburg University
This session welcomes contributions dealing with the Nordic Bronze Age in its full geographical range 2000-500 BC, either alone or in relation to the rest of Europe. The session will nevertheless include papers with other perspectives than mobility and especially encourages papers which present exiting new finds and promising new investigations that may help to locate future research agendas within the major field of Nordic Bronze Age archaeology. Contributors are asked to address this latter issue in their communications.